Frank v. Schultz

Full title: TOBIAS A. FRANK, Plaintiff, v. DERRICK SCHULTZ, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Sep 6, 2013

EDCV 12-1848 JAK (SS) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 6, 2013)

Opinion

TOBIAS A. FRANK, Plaintiff, v. DERRICK SCHULTZ, et al., Defendants. No. EDCV 12-1848 JAK (SS) United States District Court, C.D. California. September 6, 2013

          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          JOHN A. KRONSTADT, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Second Amended Complaint in the above-captioned matter, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The time for filing Objections to the Report and Recommendation has passed and no Objections have been received. Accordingly, the Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

         1. Plaintiff's access to the courts claim against Defendant Derrick Schultz in Claim One is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).

         2. Plaintiff's equal protection claim against Defendant Rosie Byrd in Claim Three is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).

         3. This action may proceed only on the Second Amended Complaint's retaliation claim against Defendant Schultz in Claim Two and due process claim against Defendant Byrd in Claim Four.

         The Clerk shall serve copies of this Order on Plaintiff at his current address of record.