From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frank v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Apr 12, 1962
35 Misc. 2d 179 (N.Y. App. Term 1962)

Opinion

April 12, 1962

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, ARTHUR A. KLOTZ, J.

Bleakley, Platt, Schmidt, Hart Fritz ( Dennis P. Donovan and Michael J. Shalley of counsel), for appellant.

Zelman Zelman ( Benjamin M. Zelman of counsel), for respondent.


It was an improvident exercise of discretion to deny an application for interrogatories to obtain essential testimony of two witnesses residing outside the State when the defendant found that they would not appear for trial as anticipated.

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and motion granted.

Concur — HOFSTADTER, J.P., GOLD and CAPOZZOLI, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Frank v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Apr 12, 1962
35 Misc. 2d 179 (N.Y. App. Term 1962)
Case details for

Frank v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Case Details

Full title:ABE FRANK, Doing Business as A.B. FRANK, Respondent, v. PENNSYLVANIA…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Apr 12, 1962

Citations

35 Misc. 2d 179 (N.Y. App. Term 1962)
232 N.Y.S.2d 138