From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frank v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jan 3, 2022
No. 21033-18 (U.S.T.C. Jan. 3, 2022)

Opinion

26891-16

01-03-2022

Dona Ruth Frank Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent


ORDER

Joseph Robert Goeke Judge

Due to a clerical duplication, it is

ORDERED that petitioner's Motion for Order to Show Cause Why Proposed Facts and Evidence Should Not be Accepted as Established Pursuant to Rule 91(f), filed December 21, 2021, at Index No. 60 and petitioner's Declaration of Christian A. Speck in Support of Motion for Order to Show Cause Why Proposed Facts and Evidence Should Not be Accepted as Established Pursuant to Rule 91(f), filed December 21, 2021, at Index No. 61 are hereby stricken from the record in this case.


Summaries of

Frank v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jan 3, 2022
No. 21033-18 (U.S.T.C. Jan. 3, 2022)
Case details for

Frank v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:Dona Ruth Frank Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Jan 3, 2022

Citations

No. 21033-18 (U.S.T.C. Jan. 3, 2022)