From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Franco-Williams v. Gonzales

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 1, 2007
226 F. App'x 664 (9th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 05-71710.

Submitted February 20, 2007.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed March 1, 2007.

Teresa Salazar, Law Offices of Martin Resendez Guajardo A Professional Corporation, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Janice K. Redfern, Esq., Leslie McKay, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Agency No. A76-689-688.

Before: BEEZER, FERNANDEZ, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Maria Franco-Williams, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order denying her motion to reconsider its December 11, 2002 order denying her motion to remand. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for an abuse of discretion, see Lara-Torres v. Ashcroft, 383 F.3d 968, 972 (9th Cir. 2004), amended by 404 F.3d 1105 (9th Cir. 2005), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Franco-Williams' motion to reconsider as untimely. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(2).

Franco-Williams' motion to supplement the administrative record is denied as unnecessary.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.


Summaries of

Franco-Williams v. Gonzales

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 1, 2007
226 F. App'x 664 (9th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

Franco-Williams v. Gonzales

Case Details

Full title:Maria FRANCO-WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Mar 1, 2007

Citations

226 F. App'x 664 (9th Cir. 2007)