From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Franco v. Quinones

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 2nd, 11th, & 13th Judicial Districts
Nov 8, 2017
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 92651 (N.Y. App. Term 2017)

Opinion

Motion No: 2017-00358 KC

11-08-2017

Camille Franco, Respondent, v. Kema Quinones, Appellant.


THOMAS P. ALIOTTA

MARTIN M. SOLOMON, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

On the court's own motion, this appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County, entered January 23, 2017, is stricken from the appeals calendar and the general calendar.

The appeal is from an order which denied a motion by appellant to vacate a "default judgment." However, it appears that, on the day of trial, while appellant did not appear, appellant's attorney appeared to request an adjournment, which apparently was denied, and the matter proceeded to inquest. A judgment entered following the denial of an adjournment is directly appealable with respect to that denial (see e.g. Park Lane N. Owners, Inc. v Gengo, 151 AD3d 874 [2017]). In the circumstances presented, a transcript of the proceedings on the day of trial must be provided.

ENTER:

Paul Kenny

Chief Clerk


Summaries of

Franco v. Quinones

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 2nd, 11th, & 13th Judicial Districts
Nov 8, 2017
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 92651 (N.Y. App. Term 2017)
Case details for

Franco v. Quinones

Case Details

Full title:Camille Franco, Respondent, v. Kema Quinones, Appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 2nd, 11th, & 13th Judicial Districts

Date published: Nov 8, 2017

Citations

2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 92651 (N.Y. App. Term 2017)