From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Franco v. Long

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 6, 2014
Case No. CV 11-4368-DMG (DTB) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. CV 11-4368-DMG (DTB)

01-06-2014

EDGAR FRANCO, Petitioner, v. DAVID B. LONG, Warden, and JEFFREY BEARD, Secretary of CDCR, Respondents.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Objections and Supplemental Objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed herein. Having made a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing the Petition with prejudice. DATED: January 6, 2014

/s/_________

DOLLY M. GEE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Franco v. Long

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 6, 2014
Case No. CV 11-4368-DMG (DTB) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 2014)
Case details for

Franco v. Long

Case Details

Full title:EDGAR FRANCO, Petitioner, v. DAVID B. LONG, Warden, and JEFFREY BEARD…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 6, 2014

Citations

Case No. CV 11-4368-DMG (DTB) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 2014)

Citing Cases

Banks v. Atchley

See, e.g., Nijmeddin v. Lizarraga, No. 18-cv-05588-BLF, 2021 WL 3810256, at *20-22 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 26, 2021);…