Franco v. City of Seat Pleasant

1 Citing case

  1. Stone v. Trump

    400 F. Supp. 3d 317 (D. Md. 2019)   Cited 38 times
    Holding that a party moving to dissolve or modify a preliminary injunction must establish "a significant change either in factual conditions or in law" that makes "enforcement of the [preliminary injunction] ... detrimental to the public interest"

    If, however, the defendants "openly announce[ ] [their] intention to reenact precisely the same provision after a lawsuit is dismissed, a court may still have jurisdiction despite statutory changes discontinuing the challenged conduct." Franco v. City of Seat Pleasant, No. GJH-18-2027, 2019 WL 1317340, at *4 (D.Md. Mar. 21, 2019) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Valero, 211 F.3d at 116 ). In this case, Defendants have met their burden.