From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Franco v. Am. Airlines, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 2, 2022
21-CV-5918 (PGG) (JW) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 2, 2022)

Opinion

21-CV-5918 (PGG) (JW)

09-02-2022

JUSTIN FRANCO, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., Defendant.


ORDER

JENNIFER E. WILLIS, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Defendant shall file proof of personal service on Stefan Soogrim of its motion to compel (Dkt. No. 39) on the docket. Soogrim shall respond to Defendant's motion within 14 days of service of the motion. Defendant's reply shall be due seven days after service of Soogrim's response. If Soogrim fails to respond to Defendant's motion, this Court may issue an order directing the United States Marshal to bring him before the Court and hold him in prison until such time as he purges his civil contempt by complying with the Rule 45 subpoena. Any potential contempt can be avoided by responding to Defendant's subpoena. The Court may also order that Soogrim compensate Defendant for damages resulting from his noncompliance. Defendant shall file proof of personal service on Soogrim of this order on the docket.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Franco v. Am. Airlines, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 2, 2022
21-CV-5918 (PGG) (JW) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 2, 2022)
Case details for

Franco v. Am. Airlines, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JUSTIN FRANCO, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 2, 2022

Citations

21-CV-5918 (PGG) (JW) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 2, 2022)