From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Francisco v. Columbus

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 21, 1938
18 N.E.2d 404 (Ohio 1938)

Opinion

No. 27308

Decided December 21, 1938.

Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Municipal zoning ordinance — Prior building permit to build factory and automobile heaters manufactured — District subsequently zoned for apartment houses — Non-conforming use permitted until abandoned — Original building used partly for storage and some equipment removed — Remainder of building leased to lessee manufacturing washboards — City not enjoined from ordering use discontinued — Section 1, Article I, and Section 19, Article I, Constitution — 14th Amendment, U.S. Constitution.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals of Franklin county.

Messrs. Watson, Davis Joseph and Mr. Peter Vacca, for appellant.

Mr. John L. Davies, city attorney, Mr. E.W. McCormick and Mr. John L. Davies, Jr., for appellees.


It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., DIXON, DAY and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Francisco v. Columbus

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 21, 1938
18 N.E.2d 404 (Ohio 1938)
Case details for

Francisco v. Columbus

Case Details

Full title:FRANCISCO, APPELLANT v. CITY OF COLUMBUS ET AL., APPELLEES

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Dec 21, 1938

Citations

18 N.E.2d 404 (Ohio 1938)
18 N.E.2d 404

Citing Cases

Carney v. City of Baltimore

An "accessory building," within the meaning of the zoning ordinance, is a subordinate building, the use of…

Brown v. Gambrel

David M. Proctor, Benj. M. Powers, Cyrus Crane and James F. Walsh for respondents. (1) Appellant had…