Opinion
February 7, 1997.
Order unanimously affirmed with costs.
Present — Denman, P.J., Green, Balio, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.
Supreme Court properly denied defendants' cross motion to dismiss the amended complaint. The amended complaint alleges the necessary elements of a cause of action under article 10 of the Debtor and Creditor Law ( see, Prometheus Books v Russica Book Art Shop, 105 AD2d 1138, 1140; Loblaw, Inc. v Wylie, 50 AD2d 4, 7) and alleges fraud in sufficient detail to satisfy the requirement of CPLR 3016 (b) ( see, Moore Adv. Agency v Shapiro, 124 AD2d 696). (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Sedita, Jr., J. — Amend Complaint.)