From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Francis v. Woody

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 18, 2011
450 F. App'x 303 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 11-6959

10-18-2011

ROMAINE FRANCIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. C. T. WOODY, Sheriff, in his capacity as Sheriff for the City of Richmond; SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT FOR THE CITY OF RICHMOND; ANDERSON, Medical Worker; ROBERTSON, Captain of the City of Richmond Sheriff's Department, Defendants - Appellees, and STANLEY NELSON FURMAN, Doctor, Defendant.

Romaine Francis, Appellant Pro Se. Robert A. Dybing, William Daniel Prince, THOMPSON MCMULLAN, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:09-cv-00235-REP)

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Romaine Francis, Appellant Pro Se. Robert A. Dybing, William Daniel Prince, THOMPSON MCMULLAN, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Romaine Francis appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment for the Appellees on his various 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Francis v. Woody, No. 3:09-cv-00235-REP (E.D. Va. July 11, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Francis v. Woody

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 18, 2011
450 F. App'x 303 (4th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

Francis v. Woody

Case Details

Full title:ROMAINE FRANCIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. C. T. WOODY, Sheriff, in his…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Oct 18, 2011

Citations

450 F. App'x 303 (4th Cir. 2011)

Citing Cases

Graham v. Stallard

Instead, his claims run the gamut—they challenge disciplinary hearings against him, his security…