From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Francis v. Szczepanski

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
Nov 10, 2016
144 A.D.3d 1593 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

11-10-2016

Stephen P. FRANCIS, doing Business as Extreme Reality Builders, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Christopher SZCZEPANSKI, et al., Defendants, and NBT Bank, Defendant–Appellant.

Hinman, Howard & Kattell, LLP, Binghamton (Daniel R. Norton of Counsel), for defendant-appellant. Frye & Carbone LLC, Utica (Richard A. Frye of Counsel), for plaintiff-respondent. Tod M. Lascurettes, Utica, for defendant Christopher Szczepanski.


Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Samuel D. Hester, J.), entered June 3, 2015. The order, among other things, denied in part the motion of defendant NBT Bank to dismiss the complaint against it.

Hinman, Howard & Kattell, LLP, Binghamton (Daniel R. Norton of Counsel), for defendant-appellant.

Frye & Carbone LLC, Utica (Richard A. Frye of Counsel), for plaintiff-respondent.

Tod M. Lascurettes, Utica, for defendant Christopher Szczepanski.

Now, upon the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties on August 8, 2016, and filed in the Oneida County Clerk's Office on September 20, 2016,

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

WHALEN, P.J., PERADOTTO, NEMOYER, CURRAN, and TROUTMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Francis v. Szczepanski

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
Nov 10, 2016
144 A.D.3d 1593 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Francis v. Szczepanski

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN P. FRANCIS, DOING BUSINESS AS EXTREME REALITY BUILDERS…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

Date published: Nov 10, 2016

Citations

144 A.D.3d 1593 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 7533
40 N.Y.S.3d 307