From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Francis v. Mullens

United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Roanoke Division
Sep 17, 2024
Civil Action 7:24-cv-00387 (W.D. Va. Sep. 17, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 7:24-cv-00387

09-17-2024

CECIL D. FRANCIS, Plaintiff, v. DOCTOR MULLENS, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

MICHAEL F. URBANSKI, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983. By order entered August 2, 2024, the court directed plaintiff to submit within 30 days from the date of the order the consent to withholding of filing fees form in order to complete the application to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee. Plaintiff was advised that a failure to comply would result in dismissal of this action without prejudice.

More than 30 days have elapsed, and plaintiff has failed to comply with the described conditions. Accordingly, the court dismisses the action without prejudice and strikes the case from the active docket of the court. Plaintiff may refile the claims in a separate action once plaintiff is prepared to comply with the noted conditions.

The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and accompanying Order to plaintiff.


Summaries of

Francis v. Mullens

United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Roanoke Division
Sep 17, 2024
Civil Action 7:24-cv-00387 (W.D. Va. Sep. 17, 2024)
Case details for

Francis v. Mullens

Case Details

Full title:CECIL D. FRANCIS, Plaintiff, v. DOCTOR MULLENS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Roanoke Division

Date published: Sep 17, 2024

Citations

Civil Action 7:24-cv-00387 (W.D. Va. Sep. 17, 2024)