From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Francis v. Equilon Enterprises, LLC

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 12, 2002
31 F. App'x 351 (9th Cir. 2002)

Opinion


31 Fed.Appx. 351 (9th Cir. 2002) Hisham FRANCIS, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. EQUILON ENTERPRISES, LLC., a Delaware limited liability company, Defendant--Appellant. No. 01-55079. D.C. No. CV-99-01196-WFN. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. February 12, 2002

Submitted February 6, 2002 .

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Wm. Fremming Nielsen, Chief Judge, Presiding.

Before PREGERSON, RYMER and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

The parties disagree regarding whether the district court amended the complaint to add two party plaintiffs, Francis & Sons Enterprises, Inc. (FSEI) and Francis & Sons Oil II, LLC (Oil II), or whether the district court merely allowed an amendment to the pleadings, alleging an assignment of interests by FSEI and Oil II to Hisham Francis. Because resolution of this issue will have a substantial effect on appeal, and because it must be resolved by the district court pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 10(e)(1), we remand to allow the district court to settle the difference and conform the record (including the judgment, if necessary) accordingly.

REMANDED.


Summaries of

Francis v. Equilon Enterprises, LLC

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 12, 2002
31 F. App'x 351 (9th Cir. 2002)
Case details for

Francis v. Equilon Enterprises, LLC

Case Details

Full title:Hisham FRANCIS, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. EQUILON ENTERPRISES, LLC., a…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 12, 2002

Citations

31 F. App'x 351 (9th Cir. 2002)