From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Francis v. Aptdeco, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 24, 2022
1:22-cv-01247-MKV (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 24, 2022)

Opinion

1:22-cv-01247-MKV

10-24-2022

JADE FRANCIS, Plaintiff, v. APTDECO, INC., JASON GRANT, KALAM DENNIS and REHAM FAGIRI individually, Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court is in receipt of a letter filed by Defendants informing the Court that the parties have reached a settlement in principle [ECF No. 18]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court's calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and as long as the application to restore the action is made by November 24, 2022. If no such application is made by that date, today's dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Francis v. Aptdeco, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 24, 2022
1:22-cv-01247-MKV (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 24, 2022)
Case details for

Francis v. Aptdeco, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JADE FRANCIS, Plaintiff, v. APTDECO, INC., JASON GRANT, KALAM DENNIS and…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Oct 24, 2022

Citations

1:22-cv-01247-MKV (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 24, 2022)