From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Francis v. AptDeco, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 17, 2022
1:22-cv-01247 (S.D.N.Y. May. 17, 2022)

Opinion

1:22-cv-01247

05-17-2022

JADE FRANCIS, Plaintiff, v. APTDECO, INC., JASON GRANT, KALAM DENNIS and REHAM FAGIRI individually, Defendants.


ORDER

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE:

A review of court records indicates that the complaint in this action was filed on February 14, 2022, and that no proof of service of the summons and complaint has been filed. Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides:

If a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court - on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff - must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time. But if the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure, the court must extend the time for service for an appropriate period.

The plaintiff is directed to serve the summons and complaint on the defendant on or before May 31, 2022. If service has not been made on or before May 31, 2022, and if plaintiff fails to show cause, in writing, why service has not been made, the complaint will be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rules 4 and 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Francis v. AptDeco, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 17, 2022
1:22-cv-01247 (S.D.N.Y. May. 17, 2022)
Case details for

Francis v. AptDeco, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JADE FRANCIS, Plaintiff, v. APTDECO, INC., JASON GRANT, KALAM DENNIS and…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: May 17, 2022

Citations

1:22-cv-01247 (S.D.N.Y. May. 17, 2022)