From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Francis H. v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 3, 2020
Case No. SACV 18-1854-KK (C.D. Cal. Feb. 3, 2020)

Summary

finding "[s]ubstantial evidence" supports ALJ's conclusion that the plaintiff's VA compensation qualifies as income

Summary of this case from Martin v. Mitchell

Opinion

Case No. SACV 18-1854-KK

02-03-2020

FRANCIS H., Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

Pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), IT IS ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration is AFFIRMED. Dated: February 03, 2020

/s/_________

HONORABLE KENLY KIYA KATO

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Francis H. v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 3, 2020
Case No. SACV 18-1854-KK (C.D. Cal. Feb. 3, 2020)

finding "[s]ubstantial evidence" supports ALJ's conclusion that the plaintiff's VA compensation qualifies as income

Summary of this case from Martin v. Mitchell
Case details for

Francis H. v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:FRANCIS H., Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 3, 2020

Citations

Case No. SACV 18-1854-KK (C.D. Cal. Feb. 3, 2020)

Citing Cases

Martin v. Mitchell

VA disability compensation also is treated as income for other purposes. See, e.g., Hassel v. Astrue, No.…