From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Franchi v. Shapiro

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 4, 1997
694 So. 2d 164 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

Case No. 96-1635

Opinion filed June 4, 1997.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Rosemary Usher Jones, Judge.

Andrew C. Barnard, for appellant.

Herzfeld Rubin and Jeffrey M. Bell, for appellees.

Before SCHWARTZ, C. J., and NESBITT and COPE, JJ.


Pursuant to our mandate in Franchi v. Shapiro, 650 So.2d 161 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), a successor judge held an evidentiary hearing at which defendant-appellant Domenic Franchi was given an opportunity to explain his actions. Ultimately, the lower court entered the order appealed which, once again, struck Franchi's pleadings and entered a default against him.

The relevant facts of this case are fully laid out in that opinion.

We reverse, as the record does not support the trial court's conclusion that Franchi wilfully and deliberately deceived the court into believing he was too ill to testify or travel to Dade County. See, e.g., K K World Enter., Inc. v. Union Spol, S.R.O., 22 Fla. L. Weekly D1118 (Fla. 3d DCA May 7, 1997).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.


Summaries of

Franchi v. Shapiro

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 4, 1997
694 So. 2d 164 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Franchi v. Shapiro

Case Details

Full title:DOMENIC FRANCHI, APPELLANT, vs. MYRON SHAPIRO, ET AL., APPELLEES

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jun 4, 1997

Citations

694 So. 2d 164 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)