Frampton v. McGrath

Full title: DWAYNE FRAMPTON, Petitioner, v. JOE McGRATH (Warden), Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Apr 18, 2011

CV 03-7797 PSG (CW) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 18, 2011)

Opinion

DWAYNE FRAMPTON, Petitioner, v. JOE McGRATH (Warden), Respondent. No. CV 03-7797 PSG (CW) United States District Court, C.D. California. April 18, 2011

          ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the court has reviewed the entire record in this action, as well as the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and all objections thereto. The court has made a de novo determination with respect to those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection has been made.

         The Report and Recommendation is corrected as follows: on page 66, line 9, the phrase "at a market" is deleted and replaced by the phrase "in the street."

         IT IS ORDERED: (1) that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge be accepted; and (2) that judgment be entered denying the petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this order and the judgment herein be served on the parties.