From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

FRAIOLI v. ST. JOSEPH'S SEM

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 25, 2003
1 A.D.3d 280 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2304.

November 25, 2003.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Dianne Renwick, J.), entered December 19, 2002, which, to the extent appealed from, denied the motion of defendants St. Joseph's Seminary and the Archdiocese for summary judgment on contractual and common-law indemnification against defendant Fitzgerald, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Anthony Pirrotti, Jr. for Plaintiff-Respondent.

John R. Marquez, for Defendants-Appellants.

Louis G. Adolfsen, for Defendant-Respondent.

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Lerner, Marlow, JJ.


Although there is no evidence of appellants' negligence or supervision of the work sufficient to hold them other than vicariously liable under Labor Law § 240(1), they have failed to present proof to establish general contractor Fitzgerald's negligence, which is necessary for indemnification under the specific terms of the contract (Keohane v. Littlepark House Corp., 290 A.D.2d 382; Correia v. Professional Data Mgt., 259 A.D.2d 60, 64). With regard to common-law indemnification, issues of fact exist as to who erected the scaffolding which collapsed, and whether Fitzgerald had sufficient control and supervision over the work to be held liable in negligence. A general duty to supervise the work and ensure compliance with safety standards is insufficient to impose such liability (see Buccini v. 1568 Broadway Assocs., 250 A.D.2d 466, 469).


Summaries of

FRAIOLI v. ST. JOSEPH'S SEM

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 25, 2003
1 A.D.3d 280 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

FRAIOLI v. ST. JOSEPH'S SEM

Case Details

Full title:BENNY FRAIOLI, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ST. JOSEPH'S SEMINARY OF THE CITY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 25, 2003

Citations

1 A.D.3d 280 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
767 N.Y.S.2d 586

Citing Cases

Vergara v. SS 133 West 21

To begin, the retention of inspection privileges, the right to stop work if a safety violation is observed…

Smith v. 21 West LLC Limited Liability Co.

Moreover, Bravo failed to demonstrate as a matter of law that it had insufficient control and supervision…