From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fraga v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 5, 1997
695 So. 2d 743 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

No. 96-3898.

December 18, 1996. Rehearing Denied March 5, 1997.

Appeal from Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County, Stanton S. Kaplan, J.

Orestes Fraga, Madison, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.


AFFIRMED.

GUNTHER, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and WARNER, JJ., concur.


ON PETITION FOR REHEARING OR CLARIFICATION


We reject appellant's challenge of his mandatory minimum sentence as being improper, having earlier concluded that this issue does not meet the supreme court's definition of an "illegal" sentence, addressable by a rule 3.800 motion, under Davis v. State, 661 So.2d 1193 (Fla. 1995); see also Young v. State, 616 So.2d 1133 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993).

Accordingly, while we deny the petition for rehearing/clarification, we certify conflict with Reyes v. State, 676 So.2d 31 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); Butchek v. State, 686 So.2d 21 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); and Todd v. State, 659 So.2d 1350 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).

GUNTHER, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and WARNER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Fraga v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 5, 1997
695 So. 2d 743 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Fraga v. State

Case Details

Full title:Orestes FRAGA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Mar 5, 1997

Citations

695 So. 2d 743 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)