From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fraga v. Fraga

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 13, 1990
555 So. 2d 427 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

Nos. 88-853, 88-2200 and 88-2292.

December 26, 1989. Rehearing Denied February 13, 1990.

Appeals from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Murray Goldman, Judge.

Young, Stern Tannenbaum and Glen Rafkin and Andrew S. Berman, North Miami Beach, for appellant.

Barranco, Kellough Kircher, Podhurst, Orseck, Josefsberg, Eaton Meadow Olin; Daniels Hicks and Angela C. Flowers and Sam Daniels, Miami, for appellee.

Before HUBBART, FERGUSON and COPE, JJ.


We find no abuse of discretion in the overall equitable distribution, Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1980). We note, however, that the amended final judgment, section V, contains the incorrect statement that the permanent alimony award is predicated upon appellant's receiving certain tax-free payments. Under the amended judgment there will be no tax-free payments. We therefore remand for correction of the amended final judgment and such further consideration of the terms of the award as may be equitable under the circumstances.

Affirmed and remanded for further consistent proceedings.


Summaries of

Fraga v. Fraga

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 13, 1990
555 So. 2d 427 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Fraga v. Fraga

Case Details

Full title:OLGA M. FRAGA, APPELLANT, v. ANTONIO O. FRAGA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Feb 13, 1990

Citations

555 So. 2d 427 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)