From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fradys v. White Plains Rd. Fitness Grp.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 30, 2022
21-CV-7891 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 30, 2022)

Opinion

21-CV-7891 (JGK)

06-30-2022

BILLY FRADYS, Plaintiff, v. WHITE PLAINS ROAD FITNESS GROUP, LLC, Defendant.


ORDER

JOHN. G. KOELTL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The plaintiff's motion for reconsideration, ECF No. 14, is denied. The plaintiff has failed to show that the requirements for reconsideration are met.

The plaintiff seeks leave to file an amended complaint. The Court has already given leave for the plaintiff to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 12. The time to file an amended complaint is extended to July 22, 2022. The Court notes that a complaint should include a "short and plain" statement of the plaintiff's claim. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a). The plaintiff should assure that the complaint states his claims succinctly, and in particular should address the deficiencies identified in the Court's original decision, including stating any request for accommodation that the plaintiff made to the defendant and any specific provision of the contract that the defendant allegedly breached.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Fradys v. White Plains Rd. Fitness Grp.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 30, 2022
21-CV-7891 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 30, 2022)
Case details for

Fradys v. White Plains Rd. Fitness Grp.

Case Details

Full title:BILLY FRADYS, Plaintiff, v. WHITE PLAINS ROAD FITNESS GROUP, LLC…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jun 30, 2022

Citations

21-CV-7891 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 30, 2022)