From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fradys v. Rondeau

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 6, 2022
21-CV-7891 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 6, 2022)

Opinion

21-CV-7891 (JGK)

12-06-2022

BILLY FRADYS, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER RONDEAU, ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER

JOHN G. KOELTL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

On November 10, 2022, this Court issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order dismissing the plaintiff's complaint with prejudice and entered judgment. See ECF Nos. 25-26. Eighteen days later, on November 28, 2022, the plaintiff filed a notice of appeal and attached a motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal. See ECF No. 28. An appeal in a civil case like this one "must be filed . . . within 30 days after entry of the judgment or order appealed from." Fed. R. App. Pro. 4(a)(1)(A). Thus, the plaintiff's notice of appeal was timely, and the Court need not rule on the plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal.

The plaintiff also moves for leave to appeal in forma pauperis. See ECF No. 27. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the November 10, 2022 Order cannot be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 348, 444-45 (1962).

The Clerk is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Order to the pro se plaintiff and to note service on the docket.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Fradys v. Rondeau

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 6, 2022
21-CV-7891 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 6, 2022)
Case details for

Fradys v. Rondeau

Case Details

Full title:BILLY FRADYS, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER RONDEAU, ET AL., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 6, 2022

Citations

21-CV-7891 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 6, 2022)