From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fradella v. City of Henderson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Aug 10, 2011
2:09-cv-0680-LRH-PAL (D. Nev. Aug. 10, 2011)

Opinion

2:09-cv-0680-LRH-PAL

08-10-2011

ADAM FRADELLA, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF HENDERSON; et al., Defendant.


ORDER

Before the court is the Henderson Police Department's ("HPD") motion to dismiss. Doc. #33. HPD contends that it is not a separate political subdivision of the City of Henderson and, therefore, is not capable of being sued as a separate legal entity. The court agrees.

Because plaintiff Adam Fradella has named the proper legal entity, the City of Henderson, as a defendant, the court shall grant HPD's motion to dismiss.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant's motion to dismiss (Doc. #33) is GRANTED. Defendant Henderson Police Department is DISMISSED as a defendant in this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

LARRY R. HICKS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Fradella v. City of Henderson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Aug 10, 2011
2:09-cv-0680-LRH-PAL (D. Nev. Aug. 10, 2011)
Case details for

Fradella v. City of Henderson

Case Details

Full title:ADAM FRADELLA, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF HENDERSON; et al., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Aug 10, 2011

Citations

2:09-cv-0680-LRH-PAL (D. Nev. Aug. 10, 2011)