From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fraction v. Protection Consultants, Inc.

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division
Mar 10, 2010
Case No. 6:09-cv-902-Orl-28GJK (M.D. Fla. Mar. 10, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 6:09-cv-902-Orl-28GJK.

March 10, 2010


ORDER


This case is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Final Default Judgment against Defendant Protection Consultants, Inc. (Doc. No. 20) filed December 15, 2009. The United States Magistrate Judge has submitted a report recommending that the motion be denied.

After an independent de novo review of the record in this matter, and noting that no objections were timely filed, the Court agrees entirely with the findings of fact and conclusions of law in the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. That the Report and Recommendation filed February 16, 2010 (Doc. No. 23) is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order.

2. Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Final Default Judgment against Defendant Protections Consultants, Inc. (Doc. 20) is DENIED.

3. Plaintiff is directed to file an amended complaint within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order and to serve the amended complaint within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order.

4. Failure to file and serve the amended complaint within the times set forth above, will result in the dismissal of this case without further notice.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, Orlando, Florida.


Summaries of

Fraction v. Protection Consultants, Inc.

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division
Mar 10, 2010
Case No. 6:09-cv-902-Orl-28GJK (M.D. Fla. Mar. 10, 2010)
Case details for

Fraction v. Protection Consultants, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER FRACTION, ON HIS OWN BEHALF AND OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division

Date published: Mar 10, 2010

Citations

Case No. 6:09-cv-902-Orl-28GJK (M.D. Fla. Mar. 10, 2010)

Citing Cases

Braxton v. Ovations Food Servs., L.P.

Plaintiff can show that Defendant is subject to the provisions of the FLSA by demonstrating that either, (1)…