From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Foy v. Yett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 29, 1944
268 App. Div. 1021 (N.Y. App. Div. 1944)

Opinion

December 29, 1944.

Present — Cunningham, P.J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and Larkin, JJ.


Judgment and order reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the verdict was against the weight of credible evidence and that defendant was entitled to have the request charged bearing upon the question as to whether or not sufficient length of time elapsed to give him an opportunity to know his rule restricting the character of dancing was being violated. All concur, except Cunningham, P.J., and Dowling, J., who dissent and vote for affirmance. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an action for damages for personal injuries received at a dance hall. The order denies a motion for a new trial.)


Summaries of

Foy v. Yett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 29, 1944
268 App. Div. 1021 (N.Y. App. Div. 1944)
Case details for

Foy v. Yett

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD W. FOY, Respondent, v. JOSEPH J. YETT, Doing Business under the…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 29, 1944

Citations

268 App. Div. 1021 (N.Y. App. Div. 1944)