From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fox v. Village of Nassau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 10, 1943
266 App. Div. 1058 (N.Y. App. Div. 1943)

Opinion

November 10, 1943.

Present — Crosby, P.J., Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.


Judgment reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellants to abide the event. Memorandum: The evidence indicates that the tree in question stands in Albany Avenue, the main street of the defendant village, but outside of the State's right of way. This being the case, it was the duty of the village to remove the tree if it rendered or was reasonably likely to render public travel on Albany Avenue unsafe. (Highway Law, § 58; Village Law, § 141. See Seelye v. State of New York, 178 Misc. 278; Murphy v. Village of Wellsville, 253 App. Div. 869.) The evidence raised issues which should have been submitted to the jury and the granting of a nonsuit was error. All concur, except Harris, J., who dissents and votes for affirmance. (The judgment dismisses the complaint in an action to recover property damage to plaintiffs' truck and trailer, alleged to have been caused by reason of the negligent condition of the highway.)


Summaries of

Fox v. Village of Nassau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 10, 1943
266 App. Div. 1058 (N.Y. App. Div. 1943)
Case details for

Fox v. Village of Nassau

Case Details

Full title:DUANE P. FOX et al., Appellants, v. VILLAGE OF NASSAU, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 10, 1943

Citations

266 App. Div. 1058 (N.Y. App. Div. 1943)

Citing Cases

Robert Neff & Sons, Inc. v. City of Lancaster

Section 723.01, Revised Code, imposes a general duty of care of the streets upon municipalities in Ohio.…