From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fox v. Uribe

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 8, 2022
18-07221 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2022)

Opinion

18-07221 BLF (PR)

02-08-2022

LEONARD JAMES FOX, Plaintiff, v. T. URIBE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR “NOTICE OF APPEAL” AS PREMATURE

(Docket No. 52)

BETH LABSON FREEMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a California inmate, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against medical personnel at Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”). On October 27, 2021, the Court granted Defendants' motion for summary judgment and dismissed all claims against them; judgment was entered the same day. Dkt. Nos. 38, 39. Subsequently, the Court granted Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration, reopened the matter, and set a briefing schedule; Plaintiff was granted fifty-six days from the date of the order to file an opposition. Dkt. No. 49. On December 27, 2021, Plaintiff filed opposition, and Defendants filed a reply on January 10, 2022. Dkt. Nos. 50, 51. Accordingly, the matter is submitted and will be decided in due course.

As such, Plaintiff's “Motion request for ‘notice of appeal' and demand for ‘jury trial' is DENIED as premature. Dkt. No. 52. Plaintiff may appeal the matter if he does not prevail against Defendants' summary judgment motion.

This order terminates Docket No. 52.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Fox v. Uribe

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 8, 2022
18-07221 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2022)
Case details for

Fox v. Uribe

Case Details

Full title:LEONARD JAMES FOX, Plaintiff, v. T. URIBE, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Feb 8, 2022

Citations

18-07221 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2022)