From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fox v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
May 30, 2012
92 So. 3d 829 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Summary

affirming per curiam with citations in case number 2D11–6121 summary rule 3.800 appeal

Summary of this case from Fox v. Johnson

Opinion

No. 2D11–6121.

2012-05-30

Robert Marvin FOX, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.


Appeal pursuant to Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Beth Harlan, Judge.
Robert Marvin Fox, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Ransone v. State, 48 So.3d 692 (Fla.2010); Garnett v. State, 957 So.2d 32 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (en banc); Ericson v. State, 932 So.2d 311 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Cabrera v.. State, 62 So.3d 1171 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).

LaROSE, MORRIS, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Fox v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
May 30, 2012
92 So. 3d 829 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

affirming per curiam with citations in case number 2D11–6121 summary rule 3.800 appeal

Summary of this case from Fox v. Johnson
Case details for

Fox v. State

Case Details

Full title:Robert Marvin FOX, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Date published: May 30, 2012

Citations

92 So. 3d 829 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Citing Cases

Fox v. Johnson

ismissing petition for writ of prohibition by order in case number 2D13–4079 as duplicative of case number…