From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fox v. Soc. Sec. Admin.

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Northeastern Division
Feb 7, 2024
2:22-cv-00024 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 7, 2024)

Opinion

2:22-cv-00024

02-07-2024

ERIC G. FOX, Plaintiff, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant.


ORDER

WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR. CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc. No. 30) recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 25). Because no objections have been filed, the district court is not required to review the R&R de novo. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 151 (1985).

The Court has nonetheless reviewed the R&R in accordance with Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Accordingly, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 30) is APPROVED and ADOPTED. The Plaintiff's motion (Doc. No. 25) is DENIED, and the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED.

This Order constitutes a final judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. The Clerk is directed to close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Fox v. Soc. Sec. Admin.

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Northeastern Division
Feb 7, 2024
2:22-cv-00024 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 7, 2024)
Case details for

Fox v. Soc. Sec. Admin.

Case Details

Full title:ERIC G. FOX, Plaintiff, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Northeastern Division

Date published: Feb 7, 2024

Citations

2:22-cv-00024 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 7, 2024)