Opinion
Civil Action No. 10-cv-03135-RPM-MJW
08-12-2011
TIMOTHY P. FOX, Plaintiff(s), v. MORREALE HOTELS, LLC, a Colorado Limited Liability Company, and SKETCH RESTAURANT, LLC, d/b/a El Diablo, a Colorado Limited Liability Company, Defendant(s).
Kevin W. Williams Andrew C. Montoya Philip L. Gordon
Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe
FTR - Courtroom A-502
Courtroom Deputy, Ellen E. Miller
Counsel
Kevin W. Williams
Andrew C. Montoya
Philip L. Gordon
COURTROOM MINUTES / MINUTE ORDER
HEARING: TELEPHONIC MOTION HEARING
Court in Session: 8:33 a.m. Court calls case. Appearances of counsel. The Court raises Defendants' Motion to Amend Scheduling Order [Docket No. 87] for argument. Argument by Mr. Gordon. Argument by Mr. Williams. It is ORDERED: Defendants' MOTION TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER [Docket No. 87, Filed August 03, 2011] is GRANTED for reasons as set forth on the record. Scheduling Order (Docket No. 20) is amended accordingly.
Docket No. 20 ¶ 6.h.(1) is amended in that each side may take each party on the other side and three (3) additional depositions excluding experts.
Docket No. 20 ¶ 6.h.(4) is amended in that defendants may serve twenty-five (25) Interrogatories, twenty-five (25) Requests for Production, and twenty-five (25) Requests for Admissions to each of the three new plaintiffs.
The three new Plaintiffs collectively may serve twenty-five (25) Interrogatories, twenty-five (25) Requests for Production, and twenty-five (25) Requests for Admissions.
Each side shall pay its own attorneys' fees and costs for this motion. Defendants make an Oral Motion to limit the number of sets of discovery and that the amendments to the scheduling order be made nunc pro tunc to August 03, 2011. It is ORDERED: Defendants' ORAL MOTION to limit the number of sets of discovery is DENIED for reasons as set forth on the record.
Defendants' ORAL MOTION that the scheduling order amendments be nunc pro tunc to August 03, 2011 is DENIED for reasons as set forth on the record. Plaintiffs make an Oral Motion regarding the scheduled inspection of the restaurant. Discussion is held. It is ORDERED: Plaintiffs' ORAL MOTION regarding the inspection of the restaurant is GRANTED for reasons as set forth on the record.
The inspection shall occur Tuesday, August 16, 2011, between 5:00 a.m. and 7:00 a.m.
The inspection shall not include the kitchen or any business office. The inspection may include the two raised dining areas, the first floor/main floor/bar area, the outside patio/dining area, and the restrooms. Hearing concluded.
Court in recess: 9:28 a.m.
Total In-Court Time 00:55