From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fox v. Manchester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 1, 1905
100 App. Div. 512 (N.Y. App. Div. 1905)

Opinion

January, 1905.


Judgment and order affirmed, with costs and disbursements, except that said judgment and order are reversed, with costs, and the complaint dismissed, with costs and an equitable proportion of the disbursements as to the appellant J. Pearl Peck. Held, that said J. Pearl Peck at the time of the accident owned no interest in and had no control over the wires which caused the death of the plaintiff's intestate, and, therefore, is not liable for negligence. The form of the order to be settled by and before Mr. Justice Spring on two days' notice. All concurred, except Williams and Stover, JJ., who voted for reversal as to all the defendants upon the ground that the damages awarded were excessive.


Summaries of

Fox v. Manchester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 1, 1905
100 App. Div. 512 (N.Y. App. Div. 1905)
Case details for

Fox v. Manchester

Case Details

Full title:Elizabeth S. Fox, as Administratrix, etc., of Ernest G. Fox, Deceased…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1905

Citations

100 App. Div. 512 (N.Y. App. Div. 1905)