From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fox v. Lawrence County Jail

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 30, 2008
Civil Action No. 06-1010 (W.D. Pa. Jun. 30, 2008)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-1010.

June 30, 2008


ORDER Re: Docs. 48, 52


AND NOW, this 30th day of June, 2008, after the Plaintiffs, Thomas J. Fox and Jodi L. Fox, filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after Defendants filed Motions for Summary Judgment, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge which granted the parties until June 19, 2008 to file written objections thereto, and with no objections having been filed, and after an independent review of the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendant's motions for summary judgment are GRANTED as to all of the federal claims.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims, which are hereby REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of Lawrence County, Pennsylvania FORTHWITH.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if the parties desire to appeal from this Order they must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed.R.App.P.


Summaries of

Fox v. Lawrence County Jail

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 30, 2008
Civil Action No. 06-1010 (W.D. Pa. Jun. 30, 2008)
Case details for

Fox v. Lawrence County Jail

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS J. FOX and JODI L. FOX, his wife, Plaintiffs v. LAWRENCE COUNTY…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 30, 2008

Citations

Civil Action No. 06-1010 (W.D. Pa. Jun. 30, 2008)

Citing Cases

Robison v. Sutter

In addition, Robison has not alleged facts to support an inference that this delay, rather than his…

Preziosi v. Nicholson

(summary judgment on medical treatment claim appropriate when there was no evidence that the delay in medical…