From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fox v. Cnty. of Sacramento

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 9, 2012
Case No. 2:11-cv-00419-JAM-KJN (E.D. Cal. Jul. 9, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-cv-00419-JAM-KJN

07-09-2012

BARRY FOX, NARCISA FOX, individually and as parents and natural guardians and Guardians ad litem of A.F., D.F., S.F. AND M.F., minors, Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, SCOTT ANDERSON, R. COCKERTON, B. MCATEE, ELISA OLMO, SOKA OM, JASON WALKUP, JOY PIKE, CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, JASMINE DELGADO and DOES 1 THROUGH 30, Defendants.

LAW OFFICES OF LANNY T. WINBERRY Lanny T. Winberry (as authorized on July 9, 2012) Attorney for Plaintiffs PORTER SCOTT A Professional Corporation Terence J. Cassidy John R. Whitefleet Attorneys for Defendants


PORTER SCOTT

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

Terence J. Cassidy, SBN 99180

John R. Whitefleet, SBN 213301

Attorneys for Defendants

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR

COMPLIANCE WITH DISCOVERY

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiffs BARRY FOX, and NARCISA FOX, and Defendants COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, SCOTT ANDERSON, RICH COCKERTON, BRENDAN MCATEE, and CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, by through their respective undersigned counsel:

1. In its Order dated June 8, 2012, the court required the County of Sacramento provide certain statistical data, if available. The court noted the parties may file a stipulation and proposed order extending the deadline for production and declaration(s) to be delivered to plaintiffs. Defendants sought reconsideration of this order. The District Court denied Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration on July 9, 2012. Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that the deadline for Defendants to comply with the Order dated June 8, 2012, be extended to July 20, 2012.

2. The parties further agree Plaintiffs have up to and including July 20, 2012 to provide responses to written discovery propounded by Defendants.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

LAW OFFICES OF LANNY T. WINBERRY

By ____________________

Lanny T. Winberry (as authorized on July 9, 2012)

Attorney for Plaintiffs

PORTER SCOTT

A Professional Corporation

By __________

Terence J. Cassidy

John R. Whitefleet

Attorneys for Defendants

ORDER

Having reviewed the above stipulation and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants have up to and including July 20, 2012, to comply with the Discovery Order dated June 8, 2012.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_____________

John A. Mendez

United States District Court Judge

DECLARATION OF SERVICE

I am a citizen of the United States and employed in Sacramento County, California; I am over the age of 18 years and not a party to the within action; my business address is 350 University Avenue, Suite 200, Sacramento, California 95825.

On the date below I caused to be served the attached:

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR COMPLIANCE WITH DISCOVERY

ORDER

XXX BY MAIL: I caused such envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid to be placed in the United States mail at Sacramento, California. ___ BY PERSONAL SERVICE: I caused such document to be delivered by hand to the office of the person(s) listed below. ___ BY OVERNIGHT DELIVERY: I caused such document to be delivered by overnight delivery to the office of the person(s) listed below. ___ BY FACSIMILE: I caused such document to be transmitted by facsimile machine to the office of the person(s) listed below. addressed as follows: Yasmin Delgado
2683 Aramon Drive
Rancho Cordova, CA 94570

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and was executed on July 9, 2012, at Sacramento, California.

____________

Ramina German


Summaries of

Fox v. Cnty. of Sacramento

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 9, 2012
Case No. 2:11-cv-00419-JAM-KJN (E.D. Cal. Jul. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Fox v. Cnty. of Sacramento

Case Details

Full title:BARRY FOX, NARCISA FOX, individually and as parents and natural guardians…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 9, 2012

Citations

Case No. 2:11-cv-00419-JAM-KJN (E.D. Cal. Jul. 9, 2012)