From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fox v. California Franchise Tax Board

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Dec 5, 2008
Civil Action No. 08-cv-01047-PAB-BNB (D. Colo. Dec. 5, 2008)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 08-cv-01047-PAB-BNB.

December 5, 2008


ORDER


This matter is before me on plaintiff's "Motion for Court-Approved Pro Se Electonic (sic) Filing". The Court has reviewed the pleading and is fully advised in the premises. The Clerk's Office has informed the Court that it has no record of receiving an ECF registration for plaintiff. In light of the fact that plaintiff has failed to comply with the court's procedures for the registration of a non-prisoner pro se party to register as a participant in ECF, it is

ORDERED that the Motion for Court-Approved Pro Se Electonic (sic) Filing (Docket No. 30) is DENIED. Plaintiff is directed to the forms and instructions found athttp://www.cod.uscourts.gov/CMECF/CMECF ActReg.aspx and is encouraged to call the Help Desk at the number listed.


Summaries of

Fox v. California Franchise Tax Board

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Dec 5, 2008
Civil Action No. 08-cv-01047-PAB-BNB (D. Colo. Dec. 5, 2008)
Case details for

Fox v. California Franchise Tax Board

Case Details

Full title:JEFFREY D. FOX Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Dec 5, 2008

Citations

Civil Action No. 08-cv-01047-PAB-BNB (D. Colo. Dec. 5, 2008)