Fowler v. Holloway

2 Citing cases

  1. Baratta's Italian Restaurant v. Mason

    129 S.E.2d 578 (Ga. Ct. App. 1963)   Cited 4 times

    Code Ann. § 114-107. Georgia and other authorities have held "employees regularly in service" or "persons regularly employed" to mean persons performing work to carry on the ordinary or established custom, mode, or plan in the operation of the business, though the work may be recurrent or intermittent rather than constant or continuous. Jones v. Cochran, 46 Ga. App. 360 ( 167 S.E. 751); McDonald v. Seay, 62 Ga. App. 519, 521 ( 8 S.E.2d 796); Russell C. House Transfer Co. v. Hamilton, 63 Ga. App. 632 ( 11 S.E.2d 703); Fowler v. Holloway, 87 Ga. App. 453, 455 ( 74 S.E.2d 376); Employers Liability Assurance Corp. v. Hunter, 184 Ga. 196, 200 ( 190 S.E. 598); Brady v. Reed, 186 Tenn. 556 ( 212 S.W.2d 378); Fowler v. Baalmann, 361 Mo. 204 ( 234 S.W.2d 11); Wallace v. Wells, 221 Ark. 750 ( 255 S.W.2d 970); 1 Larson, Workmen's Compensation Law 769, § 52.20; Ann. 81 ALR 1232; 2 Schneider, Workmen's Compensation, p. 574, § 592. Accordingly, the evidence in this case authorized a finding that the employer had ten employees regularly in service, i.e., working in the ordinary or established mode or plan in the operation of the business.

  2. Kahne, et al. v. Robinson

    232 Miss. 670 (Miss. 1958)   Cited 7 times

    I. If the Commission salesmen are to be counted, the employers here are subject to the Act. Brady v. Reed, 212 S.W.2d 378; Fowler v. Baalmann, 234 S.W.2d 11; Fowler v. Holloway, 74 S.E.2d 376; Green v. Benedict, 128 A. 20; Jackson v. Fly, 215 Miss. 203, 60 So.2d 782; Mobile Liners v. McConnell, 220 Ala. 562, 126 So. 626; Schneeberg v. Industrial Comm., 37 N.E.2d 427; Sheboygan Airways v. Industrial Comm., 245 N.W. 178; Wallace v. Wells, 255 S.W.2d 970; Secs. 6998-02, 6998-03, Code 1942; Mississippi Digest, Key Nos. 552-56. II.