From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Foust v. Ogboona

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 14, 2021
No. 2:20-cv-2229-JAM-EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 14, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-cv-2229-JAM-EFB P

06-14-2021

CARL FOUST, Plaintiff, v. A. OGBOONA, Defendant.


ORDER

EDMUND F. BRENNAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 25, 2021, the court granted his request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, obligating him to pay the filing fee in full through monthly payments. ECF No. 32; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). Plaintiff now seeks to be refunded the portion of the filing fee that he has already paid because the court recommended that his case be dismissed (ECF No. 38). ECF No. 40.

Plaintiff is not entitled to a refund. His request is denied and he remains obligated to pay the entire filing fee “in increments.” Williams v. Paramo, 775 F.3d 1182, 1185 (9th Cir. 2015); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) & (2); Taylor v. Delatoore, 281 F.3d 844, 847 (9th Cir. 2002) (“Under the PLRA, all prisoners who file IFP civil actions must pay the full amount of the filing fee.”).

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff s May 3, 2021 request (ECF No. 40) is denied.


Summaries of

Foust v. Ogboona

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 14, 2021
No. 2:20-cv-2229-JAM-EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 14, 2021)
Case details for

Foust v. Ogboona

Case Details

Full title:CARL FOUST, Plaintiff, v. A. OGBOONA, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jun 14, 2021

Citations

No. 2:20-cv-2229-JAM-EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 14, 2021)