From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Foust v. Allen

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 28, 2023
2:23-CV-0179-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 28, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-CV-0179-DMC-P

04-28-2023

CARL FOUST, Plaintiff, v. ALLEN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis. See ECF No. 2. Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis is, therefore, granted.

The sufficiency of Plaintiff's complaint and service thereof will be addressed separately.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Foust v. Allen

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 28, 2023
2:23-CV-0179-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 28, 2023)
Case details for

Foust v. Allen

Case Details

Full title:CARL FOUST, Plaintiff, v. ALLEN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Apr 28, 2023

Citations

2:23-CV-0179-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 28, 2023)