From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fourth v. State

Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Mar 17, 2022
971 N.W.2d 890 (N.D. 2022)

Opinion

No. 20210285

03-17-2022

Cliffton T. FOURTH, Petitioner and Appellant v. STATE of North Dakota, Respondent

Benjamin C. Pulkrabek, Mandan, ND, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.


Benjamin C. Pulkrabek, Mandan, ND, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Cliffton Fourth appeals from an order denying his application for post-conviction relief claiming he received ineffective assistance of counsel during a probation revocation hearing. Following an evidentiary hearing on his application, the district court found Fourth failed to establish the first prong of the Strickland test that his attorney's representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and, even if Fourth had met the first prong, he did not establish he was prejudiced by the alleged deficient performance. The district court did not clearly err in finding Fourth did not prove ineffective assistance of counsel and denying his application for post-conviction relief. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.

Gerald W. VandeWalle

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Jerod E. Tufte


Summaries of

Fourth v. State

Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Mar 17, 2022
971 N.W.2d 890 (N.D. 2022)
Case details for

Fourth v. State

Case Details

Full title:Cliffton T. FOURTH, Petitioner and Appellant v. STATE of North Dakota…

Court:Supreme Court of North Dakota.

Date published: Mar 17, 2022

Citations

971 N.W.2d 890 (N.D. 2022)