From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fourth v. State

Supreme Court of North Dakota
Mar 17, 2022
2022 N.D. 60 (N.D. 2022)

Opinion

20210285

03-17-2022

Cliffton T. Fourth, Petitioner and Appellant v. State of North Dakota, Respondent

Benjamin C. Pulkrabek, Mandan, ND, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.


Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable James S. Hill, Judge.

Benjamin C. Pulkrabek, Mandan, ND, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.

PER CURIAM.

[¶1] Cliffton Fourth appeals from an order denying his application for post-conviction relief claiming he received ineffective assistance of counsel during a probation revocation hearing. Following an evidentiary hearing on his application, the district court found Fourth failed to establish the first prong of the Strickland test that his attorney's representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and, even if Fourth had met the first prong, he did not establish he was prejudiced by the alleged deficient performance. The district court did not clearly err in finding Fourth did not prove ineffective assistance of counsel and denying his application for post-conviction relief. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J., Gerald W.VandeWalle, Daniel J. Crothers, Lisa Fair McEvers, Jerod E. Tufte


Summaries of

Fourth v. State

Supreme Court of North Dakota
Mar 17, 2022
2022 N.D. 60 (N.D. 2022)
Case details for

Fourth v. State

Case Details

Full title:Cliffton T. Fourth, Petitioner and Appellant v. State of North Dakota…

Court:Supreme Court of North Dakota

Date published: Mar 17, 2022

Citations

2022 N.D. 60 (N.D. 2022)