From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fournier v. Mauro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1933
240 App. Div. 766 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)

Opinion

July, 1933.


Judgment, so far as appealed from, reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, and judgment directed in favor of plaintiff, establishing his lien for the amount found due, with costs. In our opinion, plaintiff's lien is valid and complies substantially with subdivision 4 of section 9 Lien of the Lien Law. Although the lien states aggregate sums as the agreed price and value of the labor performed and to be performed and the materials furnished and to be furnished, it further states the amounts unpaid for the labor performed and for the materials furnished, and the plain inference is that these latter amounts are the agreed price or value of the labor actually performed and the materials actually furnished. This is all that is required by the Lien Law. Findings of fact and conclusions of law inconsistent with this decision are reversed and new findings and conclusions will be made in conformity herewith. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

Fournier v. Mauro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1933
240 App. Div. 766 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)
Case details for

Fournier v. Mauro

Case Details

Full title:GARRET FOURNIER, Appellant, v. ANGELO MAURO and Others, Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 1, 1933

Citations

240 App. Div. 766 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)