From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Four Asteria Realty v. BCP Bank

Supreme Court of the State of New York. Kings County
Feb 26, 2009
22 Misc. 3d 1127 (N.Y. Misc. 2009)

Summary

granting summary judgment because "a claim for tortious interference with prospective economic advantage must contain allegations of a specific prospective business relationship which the defendant purportedly frustrated"

Summary of this case from Kumaranayagam Balakrishnan v. Kusel

Opinion

February 26, 2009.


Landlord and Tenant — Lease — Termination.


Summaries of

Four Asteria Realty v. BCP Bank

Supreme Court of the State of New York. Kings County
Feb 26, 2009
22 Misc. 3d 1127 (N.Y. Misc. 2009)

granting summary judgment because "a claim for tortious interference with prospective economic advantage must contain allegations of a specific prospective business relationship which the defendant purportedly frustrated"

Summary of this case from Kumaranayagam Balakrishnan v. Kusel
Case details for

Four Asteria Realty v. BCP Bank

Case Details

Full title:Four Asteria Realty, LLC v. BCP Bank of N. Am

Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York. Kings County

Date published: Feb 26, 2009

Citations

22 Misc. 3d 1127 (N.Y. Misc. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 50315

Citing Cases

Kumaranayagam Balakrishnan v. Kusel

Because both potential theories for recovery on this "malicious interference with profession" cause of action…

Four Asteria Realty, LLC v. BCP Bank of North America

BCP's remaining contentions have been rendered academic in light of our determination. [Prior Case History:…