From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fountain Grp. of Cos. of Utah v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Mar 25, 2022
No. 10327-18 (U.S.T.C. Mar. 25, 2022)

Opinion

10327-18

03-25-2022

FOUNTAIN GROUP OF COMPANIES OF UTAH, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER OF DISMISSAL AND DECISION

Patrick J. Urda Judge

This case was continued from the Court's June 2019, Denver, Colorado, trial session, with jurisdiction retained by the undersigned. On March 9, 2022, the Commissioner filed a motion to dismiss for failure to properly prosecute.

We originally continued this case because the corporate officer representative of petitioner Fountain Group of Companies of Utah (Fountain Group), Edmund E. Wilson, was incarcerated at the time. Since that time we have heard from Fountain Group twice, on June 13, 2019, and July 9, 2019. Although the Commissioner was in some contact with it until February 2021, it has been wholly unresponsive to the Court since Mr. Wilson's release from prison.

In particular, Fountain Group has failed to update the Court as to its current address, which it is required to do (in writing) under Rule 21(b)(4) of our Rules of Practice and Procedure. The Court has attempted to find an address (or telephone number) for Fountain Group for approximately a year, after it received the return of its January 28, 2021, order directing Fountain Group and the Commissioner to file status reports as to progress in settlement talks. The Court's efforts in this regard, however, have been unsuccessful.

As Fountain Group has neither participated in this case for more than a year nor complied with its obligations to update its address, we will grant the Commissioner's motion to dismiss. We note for Fountain Group's benefit that, should it wish to resume this case, it has 30 days to move to vacate this decision, pursuant to Rule 162 of our Rules of Practice and Procedure.

After due consideration, it is

ORDERED that the Commissioner's motion to dismiss for failure to properly prosecute is granted, and this case is dismissed for failure to properly prosecute. It is further

ORDERED and DECIDED that there are deficiencies in income tax and additions to tax, as set forth in the notice of deficiency dated March 13, 2018, due from petitioner as follows:

Additions to Tax Under I.R.C. §§

Year

Deficiency

6651(a)(1)

6651(a)(2)

6655

2006

$166,229.00

$37,401.53

$41,557.25

$7,893.61

2007

1, 875, 696.00

422, 031.60

468, 924.00

86, 722.19


Summaries of

Fountain Grp. of Cos. of Utah v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Mar 25, 2022
No. 10327-18 (U.S.T.C. Mar. 25, 2022)
Case details for

Fountain Grp. of Cos. of Utah v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:FOUNTAIN GROUP OF COMPANIES OF UTAH, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Mar 25, 2022

Citations

No. 10327-18 (U.S.T.C. Mar. 25, 2022)