Foster v. State

Full title: Lorenzo FOSTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Date published: Aug 16, 2022

649 S.W.3d 401 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. ED 110095

08-16-2022

Lorenzo FOSTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

FOR APPELLANT: Lisa M. Stroup, Missouri Public Defender Office, 1010 Market St., Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101. FOR RESPONDENTS: Eric St. Schmitt, Attorney General, Zeb J. Charlton, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

PER CURIAM.

FOR APPELLANT: Lisa M. Stroup, Missouri Public Defender Office, 1010 Market St., Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.

FOR RESPONDENTS: Eric St. Schmitt, Attorney General, Zeb J. Charlton, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

Before Angela T. Quigless, P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Robert M. Clayton III, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lorenzo Foster appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).