From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Foster v. Rys Holdings, LLC

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division
Nov 16, 2023
3:23-cv-1545 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 16, 2023)

Opinion

3:23-cv-1545

11-16-2023

Leland Foster, Plaintiff, v. Rys Holdings, LLC, Defendant.


ORDER

Jeffrey J. Helmick United States District Judge.

Plaintiff filed a Complaint in this case on August 8, 2023. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) provides:

If a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court--on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff--must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time. But if the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure, the court must extend the time for service for an appropriate period.

Ninety days have elapsed since the filing of the Complaint, and there is no indication on the docket that Plaintiff has perfected service on Defendant.

By December 8, 2023, Plaintiff shall either show service has been perfected or show cause for the failure to do so. If Plaintiff fails to do so, this action will be dismissed without prejudice under Rule 4(m).

So Ordered.


Summaries of

Foster v. Rys Holdings, LLC

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division
Nov 16, 2023
3:23-cv-1545 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 16, 2023)
Case details for

Foster v. Rys Holdings, LLC

Case Details

Full title:Leland Foster, Plaintiff, v. Rys Holdings, LLC, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Nov 16, 2023

Citations

3:23-cv-1545 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 16, 2023)