Foster v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corp.

Full title: CHARLES T. FOSTER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. PORT AUTHORITY TRANS-HUDSON…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Apr 26, 1989

873 F.2d 633 (2d Cir. 1989)

Opinion

No. 704, Docket 88-7924.

Argued February 8, 1989.

Decided April 26, 1989.

Richard W. Miller, Islip, N.Y. (Peter M.J. Reilly, O'Hagan and Reilly, Islip, N.Y., of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant.

Arthur P. Berg, New York City (Patrick J. Falvey, Anne M. Tannenbaum, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Before KEARSE and WINTER, Circuit Judges, and SWEET, District Judge.^_

_ The Hon. Robert W. Sweet, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

This case raises precisely the same issue as that decided this day in Feeney v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corporation, (2d Cir. 1989). 873 F.2d 628. We reverse and remand for the reasons stated in that opinion.