From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Foster v. Mendez

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 6, 2022
2:22-cv-607-JAM-KJN PS (E.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-607-JAM-KJN PS

06-06-2022

MARTIN LEE FOSTER, Plaintiff, v. ALINA MENDEZ, Defendant.


ORDER

(ECF No. 3.)

HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

On April 14, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 3), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and recommendations in full.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 3) are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. The action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.


Summaries of

Foster v. Mendez

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 6, 2022
2:22-cv-607-JAM-KJN PS (E.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2022)
Case details for

Foster v. Mendez

Case Details

Full title:MARTIN LEE FOSTER, Plaintiff, v. ALINA MENDEZ, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 6, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-607-JAM-KJN PS (E.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2022)