From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Foster v. Lykes Bros. Steamship Company

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Dec 12, 1966
368 F.2d 326 (5th Cir. 1966)

Opinion

No. 23120.

November 4, 1966. Rehearing Denied December 12, 1966.

Charles R. Maloney, New Orleans, La., for appellant.

James L. Schupp, Jr., William E. Wright, New Orleans, La., for appellees. Terriberry, Rault, Carroll, Yancey Farrell, New Orleans, La., of counsel.

Before THORNBERRY and COLEMAN, Circuit Judges, and YOUNG, District Judge.


This is a suit in admiralty by a longshoreman for injuries sustained aboard a vessel of the defendants while it was being loaded at a wharf in New Orleans. Appellant has received the compensation due him under the Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act, but further contends that he is entitled to recovery because the vessel was unseaworthy. The District Court granted summary judgment for the defendant.

Careful consideration of the record, including the deposition of the plaintiff, reveals no indication of unseaworthiness and that there was no genuine issue of fact thereasto. We must affirm. Admiralty Rule 58; Neal v. Lykes Bros. Steamship Co., 5 Cir., 1962, 306 F.2d 313; McQuiston v. Freighters and Tankers Steamship Company, 5 Cir., 1964, 327 F.2d 746.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Foster v. Lykes Bros. Steamship Company

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Dec 12, 1966
368 F.2d 326 (5th Cir. 1966)
Case details for

Foster v. Lykes Bros. Steamship Company

Case Details

Full title:Will FOSTER, Appellant, v. LYKES BROS. STEAMSHIP COMPANY, Inc., et al.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Dec 12, 1966

Citations

368 F.2d 326 (5th Cir. 1966)

Citing Cases

Candiano v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.

But what has happened since Alexander and Candiano were argued (October 28, 1966 and December 13, 1966,…

Kelly v. S. S. Tyson Lykes

It was completely foreseeable that longshoremen might not put 43 pound cartons squarely into place when they…