From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Foster v. Hobbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Jun 18, 2013
CASE NO. 5:12CV00173 BSM (E.D. Ark. Jun. 18, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 5:12CV00173 BSM

06-18-2013

CHARLES E. FOSTER, JR. ADC #147301 PETITIONER v. RAY HOBBS, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction RESPONDENT


JUDGMENT

The proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney, along with the filed objections, have been reviewed. After careful consideration and a de novo review, it is concluded that the findings and recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects.

Accordingly, judgment shall be entered dismissing this complaint with prejudice. The motion for writ of mandamus [Doc. No. 37] is denied.

A certificate of appealability will not be issued because petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)-(2).

____________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Foster v. Hobbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Jun 18, 2013
CASE NO. 5:12CV00173 BSM (E.D. Ark. Jun. 18, 2013)
Case details for

Foster v. Hobbs

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES E. FOSTER, JR. ADC #147301 PETITIONER v. RAY HOBBS, Director…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION

Date published: Jun 18, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 5:12CV00173 BSM (E.D. Ark. Jun. 18, 2013)